Metropolitan Planning Council

Understanding the South Branch/Bubbly Creek (Reach 4)

River Reach 4 illustration

About the Project

The Chicago River System has evolved since the launch of the Our Great Rivers initiative. To determine if Chicago is reducing barriers to the good life and fostering shared prosperity for its residents and business all along the river system, this evaluation notes how the system and its surrounding communities have changed over time. Consistent with the project structure, the findings are organized into the themes of inviting, productive, and living.

About the Approach

The Our Great Rivers project considers the Chicago River System as six distinct areas, or ‘reaches.’ The following analysis shares demographic, socioeconomic, community development, and ecological data and trends between approximately 2015 and 2025 to detail transformations along or near the river system.

In the Current

Want to get to know a catalytic project and leader bringing the vision of Our Great Rivers to life in Reach 4? To learn more about an initiative creating lasting benefits for local communities and the river system, explore a story of transformation: Park 571.

A Glimpse Into Reach 4: the South Branch/Bubbly Creek

Where is this reach located?

This reach includes the South Branch of the Chicago River, the Sanitary Ship Canal, and Bubbly Creek. Bounded by S. Cicero Avenue to the southwest and W 18th Street to the north, the overall length is 6.5 miles. The stretch includes the southern end of Ping Tom Park and other smaller parks including Park No. 571, Canal Origins, the Canalport Riverwalk Park, and La Villita Park. It touches the community areas of Chinatown, Armour Square, Pilsen, Bridgeport, Lower West Side, Little Village, McKinley Park, Brighton Park, Archer Heights, South Lawndale, and Garfield Ridge.

What are the main characteristics of this reach?

The South Branch/Bubbly Creek is characterized by its industrial legacy and ongoing, active industrial uses today alongside residential developments. Parks, including Ping Tom Park in Chinatown and Park No. 571 in Bridgeport, and trails have been added over time, but the industrial character still predominates.

What’s rising to the surface in this reach?

The key findings and trends of this reach show a nuanced story about this reach – and our river system as a whole. The South Branch/Bubbly Creek reach has maintained a relatively stable population, though population change has looked different across racial and ethnic groups. More Asian and white residents have moved in, and some Latinx residents have moved out. The area has gotten more expensive, with homes near the river seeing increasing values and rental costs at a higher rate than neighboring areas. There has also been investment in commercial, industrial, and multifamily development, as the vacancy rates of these property types have declined, and their sale and rental costs increased. Industrial land uses still dominate the riverfront in this reach, limiting access to public trails and open space. Bubbly Creek continues to face disproportionate combined sewer overflow impacts. At the same time, new riverwalks, community-led planning, habitat projects, and infrastructure investments demonstrate a path forward. The central challenge is to ensure that future development expands public access, restores ecological health, and delivers lasting benefits to the communities that have long lived and worked along the South Branch.

MPC developed data points to characterize changes along Chicago’s River System between approximately 2015-2025. This page gives a general overview of the ways the area surrounding this reach has, or has not, transformed. For more in-depth data, further analysis, and the sources used for this research, view the complete data sets at the link below.

View River Reach 4 Data Sets

Increasing

Decreasing

Same or similar

Good

Fair

Poor

How has the area changed over time?

(2014-2022)
Demographics

Between 2014 and 2022, the South Branch/Bubbly Creek reach maintained a steady population, however, population change looked different by racial and ethnic groups.

Population growth was greatest along the river among Asian residents at 20%, a net increase of nearly 2,900 residents, followed by white residents at 12%, or a net increase of 1,250 residents.

Latinx population loss was similar along both the river and adjacent tracts (12% and 9% respectively), indicating a broader neighborhood trend of Latinx population loss.

Socioeconomics

The median household income, rent, and home value all increased along the South Branch at similar rates to citywide overall. However, rent and home values increased at a higher rate along the river than in adjacent neighborhood tracts, by 36% and 46% respectively.


Inviting Rivers Data

How has the area become more, or less, inviting?

Land Use

Industrial land use predominates the South Branch, making up 40% of the share of land in river tracts 2020. For comparison, the next most common land use type is single family housing, which makes up just 14% of land use in this area.

Industrial land use decreased between 2010 and 2020, by about 1.3 percentage points and 61 acres, but it remains the most common land use along the river here. Commercial land use is the fastest growing, up 2.4 percentage points and 112 acres. In 2020, commercial land use made up 10% of the share of land in the area.

The predominance of industrial use in the reach limits access to the river for recreation. Much of the Chicago Community Trust’s Our Great Rivers grant recipients’ work focused on making the South Branch more inviting. A particularly impactful example: Little Village Environmental Justice Organization (LVEJO) partnered with the Southeast Environmental Task Force and the Natural Resources Defense Council to develop a map showing the cumulative effects of environmental and social stressors, identifying the most burdened communities in Chicago. This helped set the groundwork for Chicago’s Cumulative Impact Assessment and Environmental Justice Action Plan, which includes specific policy changes to protect neighborhoods from the cumulative impact of environmental burdens.

Physical Improvements and Access Points

This reach has significantly less trail access than other reaches. Just 18% of the river edge has a trail, and there are 17 access points. Our Great Rivers grant cohort projects have sought to expand trail access and made physical improvements to riverside areas to make them more inviting: Coalition for a Better Chinese American Community (CBCAC) commissioned two large murals inspired by traditional Chinese culture under the Ping Tom Park viaduct, El Paseo Community Garden partnered with the Yollocalli Arts Reach Public Art internship program to create the “Rainbow Bridge” mural on the Loomis Street bridge, connecting Pilsen and Bridgeport over the Chicago River, and The South Branch Park Advisory Council created a Framework Plan for the South Branch Parks to better connect the parks and sets priorities for a South Branch riverwalk. McKinley Park Development Council picked up the plan and developed the South Branch Connectivity Project that lays a framework for extending the riverwalk to Western Avenue. The 2019 updated Chicago River Design Guidelines also expanded trail access in this area by requiring all new riverfront development to establish a 30-foot setback with public access and a pedestrian path.

Prologis’ Amazon warehouse on Halsted and the South Branch river, for example, was required to develop a riverwalk that is now open for public access and includes 627 square feet of wetland habitat provided by Urban Rivers’ floating wetlands.


Productive Rivers Data

How has the reach become more, or less, productive?

Office, Industrial, and Multifamily Development

The average sale price per square foot for office, industrial, and multifamily property within 2 blocks of the river in this reach is relatively low compared to other reaches at $63.50 per square foot.

The sale price has increased slightly over the last decade, by about $12.50 per square foot, which is a 25% increase. Rental costs for office, industrial, and multifamily property increased at a much higher rate than other reaches, by about 160%, or $11 per square foot. Vacancy rates in office, industrial, and multifamily properties decreased by 7 percentage points in the last decade. This reach and the North Branch/North Shore reach are the only reaches that saw a decrease in vacancy of this kind of property. The vacancy rate is very low for office, industrial, and multifamily properties within two blocks of the river at just 2%.

Vacancy

The total number of vacant lots in the larger geography of river tracts and adjacent tracts along this reach decreased as well between 2014 and 2022. This may indicate a broader trend of development and decreasing vacant lots in the communities along the South Branch.

Jobs and Businesses

The South Branch reach was one of the only reaches to see a decline in jobs along the river. The area saw a 6% decrease in jobs between 2012 and 2021, which was about 2,000 jobs. This was a slightly greater rate than in adjacent tracts, which saw a 2% decrease in jobs. Businesses declined at a similar rate to the citywide trend.


Living Rivers Data

How has this reach become more, or less, living?

Water Quality

Chicago has a combined sewer system, meaning that sewage and stormwater from rainfall and melting snow enters the same pipe system. When this system is overwhelmed, the combined sewage and stormwater is emptied directly into our river system, polluting the river and increasing the risk of flooding. This emptying of sewage and stormwater into the river system is called a combined sewer overflow (CSO). Combined sewer overflows (CSOs) were more common in the South Branch/ Bubbly Creek reach than in other areas in Chicago’s river system. Between 2016 and 2021, this reach saw 1,251 CSO events. Bubbly Creek can be particularly affected by CSO events due to it’s nearly stagnant flow. The number of CSO events has declined over time with the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District’s (MWRD) efforts in the Tunnel and Reservoir Plan (TARP), that built large, deep tunnels and reservoirs that store stormwater and sewage until it can be treated, mitigating CSO events. The TARP reservoir that affects this reach is the McCook Reservoir. The first stage of the McCook Reservoir began operations in 2017. It is located between the Des Plaines River and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal in Bedford Park, and captures stormwater along the Des Plaines River, Salt Creek, Addison Creek, and the Chicago River from the North Branch and North Shore Channel, through the Main Steam, South Branch, Bubbly Creek, to the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal.

This first stage of the McCook reservoir was designed to contain up to 3.5 billion gallons. The second stage, set to be completed in 2032, has capacity for an additional 6.5 billion gallons. The tunnels and reservoirs built under TARP have played a major role in reducing CSOs in Chicago’s water system. The number of CSOs notably declined across all Chicago river reaches and the Des Plaines reach after the McCook Reservoir became operational in 2017. CSO events are complex: the severity of each event depends on the location, amount of impervious surfaces that exacerbate runoff, weather conditions, and other factors. Our region has not seen a complete elimination of CSO events, and some years continue to see more severe CSOs than others. It is important to continue to make ongoing efforts to reduce stormwater runoff and mitigate CSO events, as the effects of climate change, such as the heavy rainfall events we saw in the summer of 2026, continue to pose pollution and flooding challenges to the Chicago region.

Urban Rivers partnered with the Shedd Aquarium in 2022 to establish floating wetlands in the area to help restore wildlife in Bubbly Creek.

The biodiversity of the Chicago river system’s fish population has come a long way. In the 1970s, there were fewer than 10 species of fish in our river system. Today, thanks to decades of habitat restoration and advocacy from organizations highlighted throughout this website and beyond, there are more than 80 recorded species. Fish move throughout the river system, and the number of recorded species in a given reach provide only a snapshot in time based on when the data was collected. Though there are these limitations to collecting fish species counts, MWRD monitoring station data averages over time show that this reach sustains a diverse fish population. Between 2016 and 2021, the MWRD monitoring station on Cicero Avenue along the South Branch recorded nearly 30 fish species on average annually.

Open Space

As of 2020, the most recent year we have land use data for, the South Branch reach had very limited open space, and the lowest share of open space of all river tracts. Less than 1% of the land in river adjacent tracts is dedicated to open space. Ongoing investment in open space is needed along this reach to give residents along the South Branch greater access to open space that other parts of the river system enjoy.

Explore the research on other reaches in the Chicago River System below.

Visit river reach pages:
View the complete data sets for each of the river reaches:

Learn more about Our Great Rivers and this Understanding Our Rivers evaluation project.

Methodology

Research Approach

This project examined how areas (census tracts) along the river changed over time, from approximately 2015 to 2025. Data related to demographic, socioeconomic, development, and ecological changes, were compiled to understand how areas along the river transformed over the decade. Trends/variables included:

  • Population changes by racial and ethnic group
  • Rent and home value changes
  • Job, business, and vacancy rate changes
  • Land uses
  • Trails and access points
  • Community projects and activations
  • Fish diversity

In addition to breaking down the river geography at the citywide and “reach”-level scale, we examined data by census tracts based on their proximity to the river:

  • River tracts: Census tracts that touch a river in the city of Chicago
  • River adjacent tracts: Tracts that touch the “river tracts.” Data in these tracts act as a proxy to the nearby neighborhood in order to differentiate general neighborhood trends from findings that are unique to tracts that directly abut the river.
Research Questions

For each data area, we asked the following questions, which allow for a nuanced look at how river areas have developed, when compared to other parts of the city:

  • How do trends/changes compare across specific river areas (aka “reaches”)?
  • How do trends/changes along the river (aka “river tracts”) compare to changes in areas immediately adjacent to river census tracts (aka “river adjacent tracts”, which are the comparison groups)?
  • How do trends/changes along the river compare to changes across the city as a whole (all city census tracts)?

Sources

All sources for this research are listed on the Data Set Factsheets available on each reach page.

Authors

This evaluation project was produced by the MPC staff listed below. It was also developed and supported by Christina Harris, Alec Singer, and Kate Mackie. 

Exit mobile version